Civil Society, Human Rights Struggles and Democratization in Argentina and Russia: Some Brief Comparative Conclusions

Main Article Content

Enrique Peruzzotti
Françoise Daucé

Abstract

In terms of democratic accountability and the strength of civil society, Argentina and Russia exhibit strikingly different historical trajectories. In Argentina, the dictatorship was forced out of power, civil society could be resurrected, and the human rights movement created strong networks before its ideas were adopted by politicians. In Russia, there was no previous tradition of democracy, former communist leaders stayed in power, and politicians showed little interest in human rights or contacts with NGOs. The demand for democratic accountability was marginal and/or a foreign import in both countries, but it seems to have been institutionalized and internalized in Argentina more than in Russia, where activists are trying to conceive a civil society based on personal ties of proximity. In English, extensive summary in Russian.

Keywords


Abstract 154 | PDF Full Paper Downloads 86 PDF Extended Summary (Русский) Downloads 62 HTML Full Paper Downloads 36 HTML Extended Summary (Русский) Downloads 10

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)